TMI Blog2015 (7) TMI 1237X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 11) TMI 30 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD], where it was held that If the view put forth by the Revenue is accepted than under proviso to Section 3(1) no duty more than the duty of excise leviable under the First Schedule to Central Excise Act can be recovered from a 100% EOU - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - E/447/2012 - Final Order No. A/11150/2015-WZB/AHD - Dated:- 28-7-2015 - Shri H.K ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Shri L. Patra (Authorised Representative) appearing on behalf of the Revenue confirms that the issue involved in the present appeal and appeal decided under Order No. A/11698/2014, dated 25-9-2014 is the same. 3. Heard both sides and perused the case records. Both sides agree that this appeals covered by the case law of Gopala Polyplast Ltd. v. CCE and ST (Ahmd)-III [Appeal No. E/277/2011] de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|