9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (10) TMI 409X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: D.N. Panda Appellant has dispute on classification of two goods imported. The first goods is Thermal Printer. According to the appellant, Thermal printer shall be classifiable under CTH 84433290. But that is denied by the adjudicating authority holding that thermal printer shall be classifiable under CTH 84431990. Coverage of both the entries read as under: - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... et printer, Inkjet printer and facsimile machine. Consequently, the imported goods should be classified under 844323290. 3. On the other hand, Revenue's contention is that the device that was imported was a printer of the character of the class 8443. Therefore, learned adjudicating authority has rightly classified the goods under CTH 84431990. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records. 5. CTH ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed by appellant or shall fall under CTH 85371000 as claimed by Revenue. 8. Appellant says that it is a machine affixed to the petrol/diesel dispensing machine like a keyboard. The push buttons therein when pressed that takes input to CPU and such input data is processed to result in output. The output so generated guides the petrol or diesel dispenser to deliver the quantity of output delivered b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ods appropriately. Accordingly, on this aspect, appeal is partly remanded to learned adjudicating authority for re-determination of the classification of the OPOS (as named by appellant) according to the nature and character thereof. Appellant explains that the OPOS is nothing but a input device, which sends input to CPU. Therefore, learned adjudicating authority shall examine such aspect to ascer ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
