TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 1634X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al titled as ACIT, Circle-10 Vs. Kalpanaben M. Bhatt [2012 (7) TMI 718 - ITAT, DELHI] for the same assessment year. In this case Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT, Ahmedabad has allowed the quantum appeal of the appellant/assessee. Therefore in such circumstances penalty cannot be levied. - Decided against revenue X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y the assessee under section 54 of the Act amounting ₹ 1,00,00,000/- holding that the conditions prescribed u/s.54 of the Act for availing of the exemption from capital gains tax on transfer of a residential house property was truly & essentially not fulfilled. The AO also initiated penalty proceedings u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and accordingly, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|