2017 (3) TMI 1607

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) of the Income Tax Act as amended by Finance (No.1) Act, 2001 and not by the provisions of Section 32(2) as it stood before the said amendment? - Held that:- The issue arising in the present appeal stands concluded against the Revenue and in favour of the respondent-assessee by the order of this Court [2016 (7) TMI 1245 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] as held that the unabsorbed depreciation for the Assessm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3 onwards. - Decided in favour of assessee.
M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ. Mr. A. R. Malhotra a/w N.A. Kazi for the Appellant Mr. Sameer Dalal i/b. Sudhakar Lakhani for the Respondent ORDER 1. These Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenge the common order dated 9th October, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... this Court dated 26th July, 2016 in Income Tax Appeal No.1873 of 2013 CIT v/s. M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. and by the orders of this Court dated 6th December, 2016 and 1st February, 2017 in Income Tax Appeal Nos.1037 of 2014 and 1375 of 2014 in respect of the same respondent-assessee raising an identical issue has not been entertained. 4. In the above view, the question as proposed does not give .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X