2017 (5) TMI 1516

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... loyee receiving the impugned order, who would presumably only be a responsible person in the company. In fact, receipt of an important document, as in the instant case, which is served either personally (by hand) or through registered post, is normally done by affixing a stamp bearing the name and address of the receiving organization. Then, it is not explained as to why the same was not conveyed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd, as it would appear, a result of an after-thought. The appeal is accordingly not admitted.
SHRI SANJAY ARORA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Appellant by : Shri G.Baskar & S.Sriniranjani, Advocates Respondent by : Shri N.Gopikrishna, Jt. CIT O R D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM: This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Coimbatore ('CIT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es and documents that the impugned order was chanced upon in April, 2014, and the appeal accordingly filed expeditiously through the counsel. 3. Before me, while the ld. AR would rely on the same, the ld. DR would strongly object the admission, stating the same to be wholly unsubstantiated. 4. I have heard the parties, i.e., qua admission, as also perused the material on record. The condonation .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y a counsel both before the Assessing Officer (AO) as well as the ld. CIT(A), who could in any case be approached, so that he could certainly fill in the breach, and who is to be in any case approached, as in fact claimed to have been subsequently. The condonation petition is in vague terms, sans any affidavits by the concerned employees, even whose names are not spelt out, much less by any suppor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... SC); East India Housing & Land Development Trust Ltd. [1961] 42 ITR 49 (SC); National Storage Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT; [1967] 66 ITR 596 (SC), as also confirmed by it vide its latest decision in Raj Dadakar & Associates v. Asst. CIT (in Civil Appeal Nos. 6455 - 6460 of 2017 dated 09/5/2017). I decide accordingly. 5. In the result, appeal is dismissed as un-admitted. Order pronounced on May 19, 2017 at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X