1976 (9) TMI 184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ot examined the question of comparative hardship of the landlord and the tenant in rejecting the writ petition of the appellant. We find that the prescribed authority did consider the comparative hardship of the landlord and the tenant in the light of the evidence before it and came to the conclusion that the need of the landlord was greater than that of the tenant. The District Judge also affirme .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the evidence and come to its own conclusion which may be different from that reached by the District Judge or the Prescribed Authority. We do not therefore, see any reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court.42 2. We accordingly, dismiss the appeal but in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, we grant time to the appellant to vacate the premises on or before June 30, 197 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X