2008 (7) TMI 1052

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dvocates For the Respondents/Defendant: Sri Ashok Haranahalli Associates, Advocates for Caveator and R2 and R3 JUDGMENT Cyriac Joseph, C.J. This writ appeal is filed against the judgment dated 13.9.2007 passed in Writ Petition No. 11951/2007, which was dismissed by the learned single Judge. The appellant is the petitioner in the writ petition. The challenge in the writ petition was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the petitioner was that the above conditions were inserted to favour certain persons and to exclude the petitioner. However, the learned single Judge after detailed consideration of the contentions of the petitioner came to the conclusion that there was no merit in the writ petition. The learned single Judge rejected the contention that the impugned conditions are arbitrary inasmuch as they we .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the impugned conditions cannot be said to be actuated by mala fides and that it cannot be said that the impugned conditions were incorporated in the tender notification so as to oust the petitioner from participating in the tender. The learned single Judge further held that the decision to incorporate the impugned conditions could not be classified as arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide. Relyin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X