9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 338X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Darpan Bhuyam, Advocates, for the Petitioner. Shri Arun Bhardwaj and Kirtiman Singh, CGSCs, Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel, Abhishek Ghai, Jitendra Singh, Vaibhav Sharma, Prateek Dhanda and Waize Ali Noor, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER W.P. (C) No. 2309/2015 and W.P. (C) No. 2313/2015 challenge the Final Findings dated 11th January, 2015 of the Designated Authority ('DA') in the an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on 27th March, 2015 in W.P. (C) No. 2309/2015 and W.P. (C) No. 2313/2015 stating that any action taken by the Respondents would be subject to final orders passed in the writ petition. 3. During the pendency of these petitions, the Petitioner sought leave to approach the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ('CESTAT') to challenge both the Final Findings of the DA as well as th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 0) E.L.T. 125 (Del); Balaji Action Buildwell v. Union of India, 2016 (337) E.L.T. 166 (Del) and recently the order dated 24th July, 2017 in W.P. (C) No. 6267/2017 (M/s. Suncity Sheets Pvt. Ltd. v. The Designated Authority) 5. Mr. Balbir Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, points out that, in the present case, in the Disclosure Statement prepared by the DA, it was note ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... w of the pendency of the present writ petitions. Thereafter by an order dated 6th December 2016 in W.P. (C) No. 11548/2016 [2017 (347) E.L.T. 750 (Del.) = 2017 (49) S.T.R. 531 (Del.)] this Court set aside the order of the CESTAT and relegated the Petitioner there (Respondent No. 3 herein), to approach the CESTAT. It is stated that, subsequently, the CESTAT has disposed of the said petitions filed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
