9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 422X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i J.Manish with Ms.Nidhi Saini, Advocates for D-2 JUDGMENT Manmohan, J: ( Oral ) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, directions etc. 2. Learned predecessor of this Court vide order dated 19th September, 2013 had restrained the defendants from selling any goods under the trademark LOTUS or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... TUS goods and has no objection if the same are confiscated and/or destroyed by the custom authorities in accordance with law. 5. She emphasis that defendant no.2 has not imported any goods bearing the mark LOTUS and she undertakes that even in future no goods bearing the said mark shall be imported without taking specific permission/authorization of the plaintiff. 6. In view of the aforesaid sta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ii) and 30(iii) of the plaint against defendant no.3. 11. A Coordinate Bench of this Court Satya Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Satya Infra & Estates Pvt. Ltd., 2013 SCC OnLine Del 508, has held as under:- "4. The next question which arises is whether this Court should consider the application for interim relief and direct the plaintiffs to lead ex parte evidence. The counsel for the plaintiffs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... led by the plaintiffs and are already on record. I have therefore heard the counsel for the plaintiffs on merits qua the relief of injunction." 12. Keeping in view the aforesaid mandate of law and the fact that the defendant no. 3 has no real prospect of defending the claim as it has neither entered appearance nor filed its written statement or denied the documents of the plaintiff, this Court i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
