9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 419X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... irected to hand over the same with respective accused. As the respondent has not disputed the said facts, under these circumstances, it appears from the acquittal order that all the appellants are acquitted pertaining to the FIR as well as charges punishable Section 3 or 4 of PMLA. All the appeals are allowed. The properties which are attached by the authority are released forthwith. - MP-PMLA-3786/CHN/2017 (Misc) FPA-PMLA-1545/CHN/2016, MP-PMLA-3788/CHN/2017 (Misc) MP-PMLA-3382/CHN/2017 (A.D) MP-PMLA-2930/CHN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1548/CHN/2016, MP-PMLA-3787/CHN/2017 (Misc) MP-PMLA-2929/CHN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1547/CHN/2016 - - - Dated:- 8-3-2018 - Justice Manmohan Singh Chairman And Shri Anand Kishore Member For the Appellan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s per Document Property holder Name 1. Survey No. 297/1B2, 297/1B1 (1 acre and 25.50 cent plot) yan Kottayur Village, Natham Sub- Division, Dindigul District, Tamilnadu. ( Doc No. 575/2007) ₹ 92,000/- Smt. S. Sugumari W/o Shri A. Seeni @ Seenivasan 2. Survey No. 297/1B2, 297/1B1, 197/1A2 (1 ace and 8.50 cent plot), Ayan Kottayur Village, Natham Sub-Division, Dindigul District, Tamilnadu. (Doc No. 1011/2013) ₹ 1,30,000/- Smt. S. Sugumari W/o Shri A. Seeni @ Seenivasan 3. Survey No. 375B, New Survey No. 375/13 ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... en filed by the appellant for setting aside the attachment of the properties. Smt. S. Vasuki is the second wife of A. Seeni and Smt. S. Sugumari is the first wife of A. Seeni. 5. It is stated in the application that the FIR No. 725/2010 dated 27.12.2010 was taken up as Calendar Case No. 75 of 2011 before the Additional Special Court for NDPS and the Appellant Seeni @ seevasan was acquitted by order dated 19.03.2015 which is annexed at ANNEXURE A15 in the appeal. 6. It is further submitted that the FIR NO. 140/2013 dated 18.06.2013 was taken up as Calendar Case No. 52 of 2016 before the Additional District Judge and all the Appellants were acquitted by order dated 1.07.2017. The FIR No. 82/2015 dated 19.02.2015 was taken up as Calendar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... m the charges punishable u/s 3 r/w 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the properties which are attached by the authority of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 under Ex. P.40, Ex. P.41 is ordered to be released and directed to hand over the same with respective accused. 10. The accused were also acquitted from the charges punishable under Section 3 read with Section 4 of PMLA 2002 wherein it was further ordered that the properties of the accused which were attached by the said authority are acquitted u/s 235(1) Cr.P.C. from the charges punishable u/s 3 r/w 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the properties which are attached by the authority of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 under Ex. P ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
