2018 (3) TMI 484

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) - for Respondent ORDER Per: (Dr.) Satish Chandra The present appeal is filed against the order-in-appeal No.P-I/VSK/19/2009 dated 30th January, 2009. Period of dispute is 1984-89. 2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s. Bajaj Tempo Ltd, now known as M/s. Force Motors Ltd (the appellant), is engaged in manufacturing of motor vehicles. The appellant during the period under consideration has s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Hon'ble Supreme Court, the adjudicating authority has passed the impugned order where the demand was reconfirmed on new ground that advertisement enhanced the marketability to attract business. Being aggrieved, the appellant has filed the present appeal. 3. With this back ground, we have heard Shri S.K. Gundecha, learned Advocate on behalf of the appellant and Shri D.S. Chouhan, learned A.R. on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X