TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 549X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cise, Nagpur Versus Indorama Textiles Ltd [2017 (8) TMI 1042 - CESTAT MUMBAI] contested - Held that: - Whether the facts set out in the said order to distinguish the case of respondent-assessee and the case of IFGL [2000 (7) TMI 175 - CEGAT, KOLKATA] was pointed out to the Bench hearing the case of Indorama Synthetics (India) Ltd. would require some consideration - matter on remand. - Civil Appea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the Commissioner(Appeals), Customs Central Excise, Nagpur. Whether the facts set out in the said order to distinguish the case of respondent-assessee and the case of IFGL 2001(134) ELT 230 (relied upon) was pointed out to the Bench hearing the case of Indorama Synthetics (India) Ltd. (supra) would require some consideration. We, therefore, issue notice. - - TaxTMI - TMITax - Central Excis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|