9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 897X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oner. Thus, it is factually incorrect that written arguments were to be filed within 15 days by the petitioner. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, when he came to Courts for filing of written arguments on 24.11.2017, he came to know that order had already been pronounced on 23.11.2017 is belied from the record as the matter was listed for pronouncement of order on 23.11.2017 at 2: ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iled in para 3 of the application (running into 7 pages) have occurred which have bearing on the decision of this Court. Arguments have been heard. Written submissions (undated) filed by the petitioner have also been perused. During the course of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that final arguments were heard on 15.11.2017 and therefore, the order was reserved. Ac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .11.2017, he came to know that order had already been pronounced on 23.11.2017 is belied from the record as the matter was listed for pronouncement of order on 23.11.2017 at 2:30 p.m.. As on merits, while going through paras 3 (I) to (V) of the application, it is clear that infact learned counsel for the petitioner is asking for re-hearing of the matter and a fresh decision in the garb of present ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
