9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (6) TMI 1196X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... CENVAT Credit Account maintained by the appellants? - Held that: - it is not specifically mentioned that amount has to be deposited only by way of cash payment - the view taken by the First Appellate Authority, that deposit under Section 35F (i) cannot be made from CENVAT Credit Account, is not the correct appreciation of law so long as the CENVAT Credit is permissible for utilization as per Rule ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... atory deposit of duty required to be made under Section 35F (i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 has been paid from the CENVAT Account maintained by the appellants. 3. Shri Amal Kanti Das, Advocate appeared for the appellant. It is their case that there is no bar in amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as applicable to Service Tax matters also, that the deposit has to be made in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he appellant has deposited seven and a half per cent. Of the duty, in case where duty or duty and penalty are in dispute, or penalty, where such penalty is in dispute, in pursuance of a decision or an order passed by an officer of Central Excise lower in rank that the [Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise 5.1 It is observed from the above provisions that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... onsidered as due payments for considering as deposit under Section 35F (ii) and (iii) of Central Excise Act, 1944. First appellate authority could have a view if debit of mandatory deposit was with respect to personal penalty or payment of interest. 6. In view of the above observations the view taken by the First Appellate Authority, that deposit under Section 35F (i) cannot be made from CENVAT ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
