TMI Blog2001 (9) TMI 22X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not show anything to connect the amount derived by the deceased's wife by way of gift, with the subsequent loan advanced by her the gift of Rs.30,000 having been made in the year 1960 and the loan of Rs.1,09,423 having been advanced to the deceased five years later-the Tribunal has nevertheless proceeded to hold that section 46 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, was attracted and, therefore, part of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... would permit setting off the amount of the gift, whatever be the distance of time between the date of the gift and the date of the loan. It should be established further that the amount of the gift was part of the resources from which the loan was subsequently given. Such proof was absent in this case. Learned counsel referred to a number of decisions of this court to show that there should have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|