Revenue entertained a view that the appellant was promoting activities of the franchisee by wearing...

Revenue entertained a view that the appellant was promoting activities of the franchisee by wearing franchisee's official cricket clothing, displaying franchisee's mark/ logo etc. which was nothing but akin to promotion or marketing of the logo/ brands/ marks of the franchisee/ sponsor - No service was provided by the player, nor requiring him to discharge any service tax. - AT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X