2018 (4) TMI 813

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e of Tickets for sum of ₹ 3,53,44,650/-? - Held that: - There is no dispute that the petitioner has paid the service tax and further that out of the demand of ₹ 1,01,14,075/- (Rs. one crore one lakh fourteen thousands and seventy five only) towards entertainment tax petitioner has already deposited a sum of ₹ 87,94,847/- and now the alleged demand is of ₹ 13,19,223/- which .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n entertainment tax over whereas the entertainment tax had already paid by the petitioner to the tune of ₹ 87,94,847/- against the sale of Tickets for sum of ₹ 3,53,44,650/-. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that amount of service tax collected by the petitioner from its viewers, to whom the tickets of T-20 Cricket Matches were sold, purported to be under Se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te of U.P. Others, in which the Hon'ble Apex Court has passed an interim order by issuing a direction that there shall be a stay of demand of notice by putting certain conditions. Some identical cases are also pending before High Court. There is no dispute that the petitioner has paid the service tax and further that out of the demand of ₹ 1,01,14,075/- (Rs. one crore one lakh fourt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X