2017 (2) TMI 1344

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as an architect even if he is not registered under the Architects Act, 1972 - appeal disposed off. - Civil Appeal Nos.3346-3348 OF 2005 - - - Dated:- 14-2-2017 - Madan B. Lokur And prafulla c. Pant, JJ. For Appellant(s) Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Ms. Lalit Mohini Bhat, Adv. Mr. Parikshit P. Angadi, Adv. Mr. Prakash Jadhav, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pankaj Kr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ew that the High Court was in error in rejecting the contention of the appellant that practice under the Architects Act, 1972 is not restricted only to the architects. It is not correct to say that any one can practice as an architect even if he is not registered under the Architects Act, 1972. That being the position and with this clarification, we dispose of these appeals. - - TaxTMI - TM .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X