2018 (5) TMI 532

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pellant : Shri P. Anbuchelvan, Supdt. (AR) For The Respondent : Shri M.Kannan, Advocate ORDER Per Bench Issue involved in this appeal concerns classification of note book cover / wrapper manufactured by M/s.Mahalaxmi Offset Printers (respondents herein). From the facts on record, it emerges that these items were earlier classified under Chapter Heading 4820 of the Central Excise Tariff Act (CE .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... forum. 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of appellant, Ld. A.R reiterates the grounds of appeal. He also draws our attention to CESTAT decision in the case of B.K Paper Mills Vs Collector of Central Excise, Bombay - 1996 (88) ELT 285 (Tribunal) which was followed in the case of B.K Paper Mills Vs Collector of Central Excise, Bombay - 1998 (101) ELT 407 (Tribunal). 3. On the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hority had negatived department's change in classification, at the appeal stage before Commissioner (Appeals), yet another classification under CETA 4805 was proposed by the department. Nonetheless, in the impugned order, we find that the lower appellate authority, in paras 7 to 10, has very elaborately gone into the applicability of Chapter heading 4820, 4901 and 4805 and has correctly conclu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X