2018 (5) TMI 713

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2006-07. 2. Admit on the following substantial question of law which alone is pressed for our consideration :- (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the provisions of Section 50C of the Act does not come into operation where leasehold rights in land are transferred? 3. The impugned order of the Tribunal while allow .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dence of filing an appeal from that order was produced. 5. Today Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel for the Revenue points out that the Revenue has preferred an appeal from the order of the Tribunal in Pradeep Steel Re-Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. (supra) being Income Tax Appeal No.75 of 2012 and the same was admitted on 26th June, 2014. However, the same was withdrawn in view of the low tax effect on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eep Steel Re-Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. (supra) admitting the Appeal on this very question was not brought to our notice. 7. In the above view, this appeal has been admitted on the above substantial question of law. 8. Registry is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the Tribunal. This would enable the Tribunal to keep the papers and proceedings relating to the present appeal available, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X