Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (5) TMI 784

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion to construction of complex, should not be subjected to levy of service tax on the service defined under Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Act. In other words, who so ever provides such service, which is composite in nature, shall not be liable to pay service tax Claiming of the benefit of the judgment,[2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was ren .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The said refund application was filed by the respondent, in terms of the judgment delivered by the Hon ble Delhi High Court in W.P. (C) 2235/2011 and W.P. (C) 2971/2011, in the case of Suresh Kumar Bansal and ors. vs. Union of India [ 2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT ] . In the said judgment dated 03/06/2016, the Hon ble High Court have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... zh) of the Finance Act, 1994 was the subject matter of dispute before the Hon ble Delhi High Court. In the case of Suresh Kumar Bansal and ors. vs. Union of India, the Hon ble Delhi High Court vide judgment dated 03/06/2016 have held that no service tax shall be levied on composite contracts. The relevant paragraph in the said judgment dated 3rd June, 2016 is extracted herein below :- 55. I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... zzh) of the Act. In other words, who so ever provides such service, which is composite in nature, shall not be liable to pay service tax. Claiming of the benefit of the judgment dated 03/06/2016 cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered in rem and not in personem . Therefore, I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order, so far as it set aside the adjudication order and al .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates