9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (5) TMI 1217X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri S. S. Gupta (C.A.) And Shri Mohd. Altaf (Asstt. Commr.) AR for Appellant Shri Mohd. Altaf (Asstt. Commr.) AR , Shri S. S. Gupta (C.A.) for Respondent Per: Anil Choudhary These cross appeals arise from common Order-in-Original dated 16th May, 2014 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow. 2. The issue in the appeal by the assessee is whether the demand of Rs. 48,7 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ice and is liable to reversal of input credit under the provisions of Rule, 6(1) of CCR, 2004. 4. Heard the parties. 5. So far the first issue is concerned regarding chargeability of service tax on the administration charges, we find that such levy have been introduced with effect from 1st May, 2011, when the definition in Section 65(105)(zx) was amended, and for the words "in relation to the ri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... m, which is at the same percentage as permitted by the "Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority, was correct". The Revenue have sought to tax the nominal difference, that is, the maximum 1.35% as permitted by IRDA Circular, being the maximum overall limit an insurer can charge and/or collect towards fund management charges out of the premium with respect to ULIP policies. We hold that no serv ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s. Further, by the use of the word "charged", it is clear that the same refers to the amount billed by the service provider to the service receiver. Therefore, in terms of Section 67, unless an amount is charged by the service provider to the service recipient, it does not enter into the equation for determining the value on which service tax is payable." 7. So far the third issue is concerned ( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
