2006 (8) TMI 657

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rt.- After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that even though several questions have been framed by the appellant, only two substantial questions of law would arise for our consideration. These are as follows : "(i) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the levy of MAT is permissible while issuing in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... all permissible or attracted in this case as no such demand could at all have been issued/raised without any hearing or proceeding before any quasi-judicial authority in accordance with law and in compliance with natural justice ?" 2. Insofar as question No. (ii) is concerned, it is now common ground that in view of the decision of the Karnataka High Court in Kwality Biscuits Ltd. vs. CIT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the levy of MAT is permissible while issuing intimation to the assessee under s. 143(1)(a) ?" 6. Paper books be filed in accordance with the High Court rules. IA No. 5428/2005 (stay) 7. Learned counsel for the appellant points out that the regular assessment has already been m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X