TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 1732X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d that:- SLP dismissed - HC order confirmed.[2017 (3) TMI 734 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] HC has held it is required to be noted that as such the "sauda chittihi" upon which the reliance has been placed, the assessee is not the signatory. Even the concerned persons who signed and / or executed the said "sauda chittihi" were not even the owners of the land in question. It has also come on record that eve ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... J.
Y. Adhyaru, Sr. Adv. Ms. Vimal Sinha, Adv. T.C. Sharma Adv. and Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR for the Petitioner
D.N. Ray, Adv. Lokesh K. Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Disha Ray, Dillip Kumar Nayak, Advs. and Mrs. Sumita Ray, AOR for the Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard.
2. Delay condoned.
3. The special leave petition is dismissed.
4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|