Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (4) TMI 219

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bunal. "(a) Whether in a search proceedings unaccounted cash which is found in possession of some other person, other than the assessee, then on mere admission by the assessee that out of the said cash some belongs to him, can be a basis of initiating proceedings under section 158BC against him? (b) Whether under given facts and circumstances of the case the assessment made under section 158BC was valid, legal and in conformity with the provisions of law, where the tax liability and its payment attracts separate rates/slab? (c) When unaccounted cash was found in the custody/luggage of Hemubhai and Krishna Shetty in the course of security check up at Sonegaon Airport, whether Inderjeetsingh, on his admission that out of total cash of R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ongs to the assessee, ir execution of the warrant issued against the assessee, his statement was recorded under section 132(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In his statement, the assessee admitted that he and his family members had given cash amount of Rs. 23,65,000 to Hemubhai Raichure and the said amount of Rs. 23,65,000 recovered from Hemubhai Raichure represented undisclosed income of the assessee and agreed to offer the said amount for taxation in his name and his family members as income in addition to the income as per the books maintained by the assessee. On October 31, 1995, notice under section 158BC was issued to the assessee. In response to the notice, the assessee filed return for the block period April 1, 1985, to October 23, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat the cash was seized from Hemubhai Raichure and Krishna Shetty cannot be accepted because in the present case, although during the course of search Rs. 34,65,000 was recovered from Hemubhai Raichure and Krishna Shetty as they had stated that out of Rs. 34,65,000 a sum of Rs. 23,65,000 belongs to the assessee, the statement of the assessee was recorded under section 132(4) of the Act, wherein the assessee admitted that the said amount of Rs. 23,65,000 recovered by Hemubhai Raichure belongs to him. Thereafter, under a panchanama the said amount of Rs. 23,65,000 was seized. In these circumstances, the finding recorded by the Tribunal that from the sequence of events from the stage of serving warrant, recording of statement of the assessee, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates