9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (9) TMI 1134X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mishra for the Applicant P.C. 1. None appears for the Respondent despite service of notice. 2. This application seeks condonation of 746 days delay in filing this Motion to sets aside the self-operating order dated 10.12.2015 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master, rejecting the applicant's appeal under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules. This for failure to remove office ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me time in December, 2017 on the official website of this court, no particulars of how and in what circumstances the website of the court was visited and the reason why it was not visited earlier. The reason given by the department is not a sufficient explanation for the delay caused in moving this Motion. In fact it evidences negligence on the part of the applicant. 4. In fact, this court in Com ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ut they do not feel obliged to do so. They expect this Court to condone serious lapses in their functioning by accepting above cause as sufficient. The cause as set out and the explanation as forwarded today, on affidavit and belatedly, reflects total negligence and callousness of the Revenue officials. Their attitude shows that they are not at all vigilant and interested in pursuing the cases fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
