2018 (9) TMI 1193

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt(s) Shri Rajeev Ranjan (Addl. Commr.) AR for Respondent(s) ORDER Per: Archana Wadhwa Both appeals are being disposed of by a common order as the issue involved is identical. 2. After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri Rajesh Chhibber (Advocate) for the Appellant & Shri Rajeev Ranjan (Addl. Commr.) AR for the Revenue, we note that the appellants filed refund claims of rebate, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... refund of the said sanctioned amounts, such refund claims stands given by the Revenue and as such the cause of grievance, as involved in the present appeals, does no longer survive. However, he claims that the appellant is entitled to the interest on the said delayed refund claims. 5. We find that the impugned orders have only dealt with the issue of adjustment of sanctioned rebate claims with t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X