2018 (9) TMI 1203

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion of this Court to entertain appeals under Section 35G of the Act is determined by the order passed by the Tribunal and not on the basis of the question framed by the appellant. This Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Therefore, it would be appropriate if the applicants also file their appeal from the impugned order to the Hon'ble Supreme Court, if they are so advised .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 17th August, 2017 of the Tribunal has been challenged by the respondent before the Hon'ble Supreme Court being Civil Appeal No.1321 of 2018 and the same has also been admitted on 22nd January, 2018. In the above view, it is submitted by Mr. Thakker that this appeal would not be maintainable before this Court. 3. Mr. Jetly, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant presses the appeal on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Vs. Eon Hinjewadi Infrastructure (P) Ltd. (Central Excise Appeal No.61 of 2017) decided on 3rd September, 2018 that the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain appeals under Section 35G of the Act is determined by the order passed by the Tribunal and not on the basis of the question framed by the appellant. Thus, this Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Therefore, it would .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X