2018 (9) TMI 1649

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Appellant Shri. M. N. Bharathi, Advocate for the Respondent ORDER Per P. Dinesha, The Revenue has filed the above appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) dt. 14.10.2014. The assessee-respondent is a holder of Service Tax Registration, in the business of manufacturing of printing and writing paper and newsprint, falling under chapter 48 of the first Schedule to the Cen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e assessee had filed appeals and in the appellate proceedings, the Commissioner (Appeals) had passed a common order wherein he had allowed the appeals of the assessee with consequential reliefs, thereby setting aside all the three Orders-in-Original. Aggrieved by the said orders, the Revenue is before this forum. 2. Heard Shri. B. Balamurugan, Ld. Department Representative for the appellant and S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... objection to the assessee's plea for remand in terms of the above orders. 5. We have considered the rival contentions and perused the documents and also gone through the orders relied on by the Ld. Advocate for the assessee and we find that the issues are identical. We also find that this Bench has not given any findings on merit, rather has only set aside to the file of the adjudicating authorit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X