9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (10) TMI 911X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - Held that:- It is clear that the Respondent No.2 Commissioner of Customs (Import) is not seeking to rely upon the statements of Mr. D'souza and Mr. Shete, for adjudicating the show cause notice. Therefore, in these circumstances, no fault can be found with the impugned communication dated 6th September, 2018, rejecting the Petitioner's request for cross-examination of Mr. D'souza and Mr. Shete. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titioner that non-granting of cross-examination, results in breach of natural justice. Therefore, this Court should interfere and direct the Respondent No.2 to grant cross-examination of the two persons i.e. Mr. D'souza and Mr. Shete. On the other hand, Mr. Jetly supports the impugned communication. 3. We have perused the impugned order dated 6th September, 2018. The impugned order dated 6th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat the Respondent No.2 Commissioner of Customs (Import) is not seeking to rely upon the statements of Mr. D'souza and Mr. Shete, for adjudicating the show cause notice. Therefore, in these circumstances, no fault can be found with the impugned communication dated 6th September, 2018, rejecting the Petitioner's request for cross-examination of Mr. D'souza and Mr. Shete. Thus, no prejud ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
