9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (10) TMI 1614X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... T. R. BHAGYADEVI, TECHNICAL MEMBER, SH. AMAND SHAH, TECHNICAL MEMBER Present:- None for the Applicant No. 1. Sh. Anwar Ali, Additional Commissioner for the Applicant No. 2. Sh. K. V. Hariharan, CFO, Sh. Abraham Ninan, Sr. Manager (Taxation) and Sh. Sudhir Mishra, Assistant Manager (Taxation) for the Respondent. ORDER 1. This report dated 30.07.2018, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... quested to provide the name and address of the supplier against whom the complaint was made, and to provide the pre-GST and post-GST amount charged by the supplier and the invoices evidencing the same, however no reply was received from the Applicant No. 1. He has also stated that the above Applicant was also contacted on the phone number available in his application and he had provided a new emai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... investigation could be conducted. 3. After considering the above Report filed by the Applicant No. 2 both the Interested parties were issued notices to attend the hearing before this Authority; however, the Applicant No. 1 did not appear. The Applicant No. 2 was represented by Sh. Anwar Ali, Additional Commissioner and the Respondent was represented by Sh. K. V. Hariharan, CFO, Sh. Abraham Ninan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t No. 2 as well as the submissions made by the Respondent and it is revealed from the facts stated above that the Applicant No. 1 had not supplied details of the products or the invoices vide which he had bought them from the Respondent inspite of repeated requests made by the Applicant No. 2 and therefore, the investigation conducted in the allegation levelled by the Applicant No. 2 against the R ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
