2018 (11) TMI 75

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Appellant. Shri G. Prahlad, Advocate for the Respondent. ORDER Per: M.V. Ravindran. 1. This appeal is filed by the revenue against the Order-in-Original No. 13/2010 (RS) dated 05.05.2010. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. A show cause notice dated 23.10.2008 was issued to the respondent demanding an amount from them for discharging the duty liability on the depot price b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... contested only this point as to non-imposition of penalty is incorrect as there is violation of Central Excise Act and Rules made there under. Respondent company is not in appeal against the said impugned order and we are informed that the respondent has accepted the order and it was stated that they have discharged the entire liability arising out of impugned order. 5. On this factual matrix, w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X