2004 (7) TMI 685

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... USTICE BILAL NAZKI And MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA For the Petitioner : MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (SC FOR CG) For the Respondent No.1 : MR.Y.N.LOHITA ORDER (Per the Hon ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki): Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed by the Department of Excise against Managing Director of Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, and an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the bar that the property was taken over by first respondent and was auctioned much before. We fail to understand as to why should this Court entertain a writ petition of the present nature, where the petitioner Department, itself can exercise its powers under Excise Act, and order recovery of any amounts due. There are ample powers available to Excise Department under Section 11 of the Central Ex .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X