9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (11) TMI 1163X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Adv., Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR, Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. And Ms. Payal Dayal, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR, Ms. Pallavi Sengupta, Adv., Ms. Garima Jain, Adv., Mr. Siddhanth Kohli, Adv. And Ms. Lakshmi Rao, Adv. JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J. 1) Leave granted. 2) The present appeal arises out of a complaint dated 16.03.2005 against Gurvinder Singh - Respondent No.1, who is a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s from the rolls. The High Court, by the impugned judgment dated 16.08.2016, after setting out Sections 21 and 22 of the Act, arrived at the conclusion that: "14. In the instant case the respondent was acting as an individual in his dealings with the complainant which were purely commercial. While selling the shares held by him the respondent was not acting as a Chartered Accountant. He was not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e." Schedule-I Part-IV reads as follows:- "Other Misconduct in Relation to Members of the Institute Generally A member of the Institute, whether in practice or not, shall be deemed to be guilty of other misconduct, if he- (1) is held guilty by any civil or criminal court for an offence which is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months; (2) in the opinion of the Cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
