Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (12) TMI 428

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... able as well as exempted final products - there is force in the submission of ld. Counsel for the appellant that it had not availed credit of duty paid on common inputs and the dispute is therefore restricted to availment of cenvat credit on common input service. Extended period of limitation - Held that:- The respondent department has not disputed the figures of proportionate payment but order-in-original reveals that in not giving such intimation/option, the assessee has suppressed the material fact that they have availed cenvat credit on common input services which was noticed only during audit, for which extended period of limitation as envisaged in proviso to Section 11A(1) prior to 08.04.2001 and Section 11A(4) with effect from 08 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... redit of duty paid on inputs/ capital goods and service tax paid on input services. Though it is manufacturing exempted goods i.e. part of bicycle valve, a component used in the manufacture of automotive tyre tube valves, it was not maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods as well exempted services against which audit pointed out payment of 6% duty on value of exempted goods and exempted services while appellant paid proportionately i.e. 1.13% of the credit availed in respect of common inputs. Despite payment of proportionate duty along with interest belatedly, it was put to show-cause notice and matter was adjudicated upon that resulted in the confirmation of 6% duty liability amounting to ₹ 16,65,169/- along wit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ould not take away substantial right of the appellant. Further in submitting a table containing the period vis-a-vis percentage of dutiable goods and exempted goods, he noted in his additional submissions, that out of the total credit of `67.06 lakhs in respect of common input services exempted goods cleared constitute only 1.13% against which duty demand @ 6% amounting to 16,65,169/- equivalent to 25% of the credit availed is absurd, irrational and inappropriate for which he prays for setting aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). 4. In response to such submissions, ld. AR for the department justified the reason and rationality of the order passed by the adjudicating authority and brought attention of this Court to the show-caus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd exempted goods the assessee have claimed that they have reversed Service Tax Credit used in relation to manufacture of the exempted goods. (Underlined to emphasised) 6. Therefore there is force in the submission of ld. Counsel for the appellant that it had not availed credit of duty paid on common inputs and the dispute is therefore restricted to availment of cenvat credit on common input service. Further, the respondent department has not disputed the figures of proportionate payment but order-in-original reveals that in not giving such intimation/option, the assessee has suppressed the material fact that they have availed cenvat credit on common input services which was noticed only during audit, for which extended period of limitat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... EA 2000 audit was therefore held to be participative audit. Likewise CERA audit is conducted by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in respect of receipt and expenditure of the Government of India. It also discharges revenue audit which covers central excise, service tax and customs laws during which time the assesses were examined by CERA audit party to point out the deficiencies, leakage of revenue and non recoveries of dues by the Central Excise Department. Therefore, it cannot be said that only because audit party had found non-maintenance of separate records appellant is to be tasked for suppression etc. 8. In exercise of option as contemplated in Rule 6(3A), the assessee has to choose either of those options and in view o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates