2018 (2) TMI 1812

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in both cases: Mr. A.K. Jayaraj For Respondents in both cases: Mr. Aravindhan COMMON ORDER The petitioner in WP(MD)No.2985 of 2018 is the husband while the petitioner in WP(MD)No.3124 of 2018 is the wife. Both had gone to Myanmar. On their return to India, the third respondent seized certain goods belonging to the petitioners herein. The orders of seizure are under challenge in these writ pe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... horities to initiate appropriate action in accordance with Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. 4.This Court is inclined to adopt the very same approach in these two writ petitions also. The petitioners are directed to deposit 50% of the duty for the value of the gold jewellery seized from them. On such deposit being made, the respondents 2 and 3 shall release the seized items forthwith. It goes .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X