9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1628X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... For the Appellant : Mr. Amit Bansal and Mr. Akhil Kulshrestha, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Karan Sachdev and Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Advocats. ORDER CM No. 10612/2018 in CUSAA 40/2018 CM No. 10614/2018 in CUSAA 41/2018 CM No. 10618/2018 in CUSAA 44/2018 CM No. 9063/2018 in CUSAA 23/2018 CM No. 9065/2018 in CUSAA 24/2018 CM No. 9067/2018 in CUSAA 25/2018 CM No. 9827 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of remand to the original adjudicating authority to first decide the issue of jurisdiction, after decision of the Supreme court in Civil Appeal preferred against the decision of Delhi High court in Mangli Impex Limited v. Union of India 2016 (335) ELT 605 (Del.)?" Counsel for the respondent states that the impugned order may be quashed and the matter may be remanded to the Tribunal for fresh dec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to their original position. The Tribunal would decide the appeals on merits including the question of jurisdiction of the officer of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence who had issued show cause notices. The said issue would be examined by the Tribunal without being influenced by the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Mangli Impex Limited (supra). We clarify that we have not expr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
