9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 619X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SCGSC, for the Respondent. ORDER These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners challenging the order passed by the first respondent, dated 28-3-2018, whereby and whereunder the first respondent directed the respondents to pay their respective duty as quantified in the demand notices. 2. The issue involved in these writ petitions are one and the same and therefore, they heard tog ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ecting the petitioners to pay their respective duties. Challenging the said order, the petitioners are before this Court. 4. The only ground on which the impugned order sought to be quashed by the petitioners is that though the respondents issued notice for personal hearing, the first respondent has not given an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners and without their consent, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at day. However, the PH could not be held on that date due to administrative reasons. The submission dated 6-3-2018 by M/s. S.R. Traders and R. Selvaraj together was taken on record. Though the counsel requested for a fresh date, the matter was discussed with the counsel and with his oral consent, the case is taken up for adjudication." 7. When the personal hearing could not be held due to a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ty to the petitioners, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. The said exercise shall be completed by the first respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to say that the petitioners shall cooperate with the first respondent for the disposal of the case within the above stipulated time. 9. These Writ Petit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
