9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (2) TMI 394X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y being carried on in the premises. Therefore, it is evident that the time granted therein, expires only on 27.01.2017, however, an order of cancellation was issued on 23.06.2017, which means that the respondent has chosen to pass the order without even waiting for the petitioner to make his reply. This Court finds that the impugned cancellation of registration was passed in violation of princi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fically contended by the petitioner that he has not made any request for cancellation of registration as found in the impugned proceedings. Therefore, it is contended that the cancellation of registration without issuing notice to the petitioner is in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, the same cannot be sustained. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ation, since such action is taken, based on the request of the petitioner alone. She produced a set of documents before this Court in connection with the cancellation of the registration of the petitioner. 5. There is no dispute to the fact that the impugned order of cancellation was made only on the reason that the petitioner sought for such cancellation through letter dated 04.05.2017. On the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... natural justice. Moreover, as the impugned order itself refers that the same was passed based on the request made by the petitioner and as it is now stated before this Court that no such request was made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned cancellation order, however, by granting liberty to the respondent to initiate fresh proceedings, if any, so warranted in accord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
