2017 (3) TMI 1738

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ee. This by the decision of this Court in Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Mumbai v/s. M/s. G.D. Birla Medical Research and Educational Foundation [2016 (2) TMI 901 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] decided on 1st February, 2016. In view of the above submission, the question no.(i) as proposed does not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus not entertained. Allowing the claim of the assessee for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ribunal). The impugned order relates to Assessment Years 20092010. 2. The Revenue has urged the following substantial question of law for our consideration: "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in upholding the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) CIT(A) allowed the claim of depreciation of ₹ 3,75,52,814/relying on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... herein stands concluded against the Revenue and in favour of the respondentassessee. This by the decision of this Court in Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Mumbai v/s. M/s. G.D. Birla Medical Research and Educational Foundation (Income Tax Appeal No.2294 of 2013) decided on 1st February, 2016. (b) In view of the above submission, the question no.(i) as proposed does not give rise to any substan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X