2019 (3) TMI 409

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Anil Choudhary, Asst. for respondent ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. Both the appellant-assessee as well as Revenue have filed the miscellaneous applications, seeking for rectification of mistake in the final order No. E/85661/2016 dated 13.03.2018 passed by this Tribunal in Appeal No. E/85661/2016. Revenue's submissions are that vide paragraph 5.1 at p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , at page No. 4, Sl. No. 11 - The amount should be read as Rs. 20,663/- instead of Rs. 2,06,633/-." (ii) "In paragraph 5.5, at page No. 6, Sl. No. 3" - The amount involved is to be read as Rs. 4,409/- instead of Rs. 206/-. 3. The assessee appellant contended that the Tribunal has not specifically recorded any findings with regard to the imposition of penalty on the appellant. It has further been .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X