9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (3) TMI 485X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a first application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by petitioner- Jagdish Kanani, who has been arrested by the respondent on 31.5.2018 during investigation in Cr. Case registered as Crime No.43/2018 by Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Indore for the offence punishable under Section 132 (1) (a), (b) and (c) of Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter, for short, "GST Act"). 2. Heard the learned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the firm under the GST Act and defrauded the Government Exchequer. The present petitioner came in the contact with Mehul Kheria. Present petitioner along with Mehul Kheria created many bogus and fake firms and issued fake invoices to get the input tax-credit through these invoices and defrauded the Govt. Exchequer and as a result of the investigation till date it is found that in total, these ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... contact with Mehul since 1994. 4. The petitioner was formally arrested on 5.1.2019 and produced before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class on 8.1.2019. Thereafter, he applied for regular bail u/s. 439 of Cr.P.C. Learned Addl. Sessions Judge has found that prima facie the petitioner has said to have committed offence not only u/s. 132(1)(a), (b) & (c) of GST Act but also u/s. 467, 468, 471 and 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d on bail. 6. On the other hand, Shri Prasanna Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/prosecution, opposes the bail application. He has produced the statement of the petitioner and other witnesses. He submits that the statement recorded by the petitioner is admissible in evidence and which can be used against him in the trial as held by this Court in the case of M/s. R.S. Company V/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
