2014 (8) TMI 1176

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ee - handing over possession is relevant for capital gain tax - HELD THAT:- In the case of Commissioner Vs. D.K.Dayal [2012 (6) TMI 405 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT], after noticing the case law on the point, has held that the date on which possession was handed over to the developer is relevant and therefore, the capital gain tax is payable for the assessment year in which the possession was handed ove .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... essee
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA JUDGMENT This is a revenue's appeal against the order passed by the Tribunal. 2. The substantial question of law which arises for consideration in this appeal is as under: "Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that capital gains tax would arise in the assessment year 1995-96 when the development a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... gh not a registered document is executed conveying the title. 4. In the instant case, the authorities have held that the capital gain tax is payable in the assessment year 1995-96 when the joint development agreement was entered into by the assessee with the developer for transfer of 66% interest in an undivided immovable property and possession of the land was handed over and not when the built .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X