2019 (4) TMI 1126

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the year 2015-2016 - HELD THAT:- No illegality in the exercise of discretion warranting judicial review in the present writ petition. The circumstances which are stated in the writ affidavit as well as before the 2nd respondent however persuade this Court to substitute 20% condition imposed by the 2nd respondent with 10% payable within 45 days from today. The petitioner enjoys the benefit o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the 2nd respondent. The subject matter of appeal is the assessment year 2015-2016. The 2nd respondent allowed the application for granting stay. However, subject to the condition of the petitioner paying or depositing 20% of the total tax demanded for the assessment year in question, the petitioner challenges Ext.P7 on the condition of 20% as onerous and the Ext.P7 order fails to take note of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appeal could be directed to be disposed of expeditiously and the petitioner can be put to some reasonable condition in the place of 20%. 5. Controversy centers round the condition imposed by the 2nd respondent in Ext.P7. This Court, prima facie , does not see illegality in the exercise of discretion warranting judicial review in the present writ petition. The circumstances which are stated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X