2018 (1) TMI 1495

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e tax demanded from the petitioner, and the same has not been given credit to by respondent No.1, the petitioner may not be liable to pay further amount towards pre-deposit. The respondent No.3 is directed to consider the plea of the petitioner and take a decision as to whether the appeal filed by it deserves to be entertained without pre-deposit, on the facts of the case - petition disposed of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the petitioner will not be liable to make any pre-deposit amount in the appeal. Mr.B.Narayana Reddy, learned counsel representing respondent Nos. 1 and 2, has, however, disputed the same. 2. In our opinion, the petitioner is entitled to be heard by respondent No.3 on the above mentioned aspects for as per its plea HUL Limited has already discharged its liability towards GTA services, wh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X