Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (6) TMI 143

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fulfilled the conditions that required to attract penalty @ 10% in terms of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 271AAB The Hon ble Supreme Court has upheld the above judgement and is reported as Sandeep Chandak vs Pr.CIT [ 2018 (6) TMI 106 - SC ORDER] pleased to hold that the provisions of Section 271AAB automatically attracts and the proceedings are to be carried out/completed where a search and seizure operation is carried out in which the assessee have surrendered the amount u/s 132(4) statement of undisclosed income, specify the manner in which this income was derived, filed return of income, admit the same and had paid taxes and interest on the same. No infirmity in the order of CIT(A) and it is justified. Thus, ground no-1 raised by the assessee is dismissed. - ITA No.1926/Kol/2016 - - - Dated:- 31-5-2019 - Sh. P.M. Jagtap, Vice President And Sh.S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member For the Appellant : M. Satnaliwala, FCA For the Respondent : A.K.Nayak, CIT DR ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 04.08 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 271AAB of the Act. He contended that the penalty notice issued by the AO, therefore, was defective and the penalty imposed in pursuance of such defective notice is not sustainable. He also contended that the specific limb of section 271AAB of the Act, was not mentioned by the AO as applicable to the facts of the assessee s case and in view of the same, penalty imposed u/s 271AAB of the Act is liable to be cancelled. He, submitted that commodity profit was earned by the assessee and since it was duly disclosed in the return of income it was not a case of undisclosed income attracting the penal provision of section 271AAB of the Act. 5. The Ld.CIT DR, Shri. Anand Kumar Kedia on the other hand submitted that even though at the top of the penalty notice, a reference was made to section 271AAA of the Act inadvertently and in the main body of the penalty notice there was a clear mention of section 271AAB. In support of the contention, The Ld.DR, Shri Kedia placed reliance in the case of Galaxy Nirman Private Limited and submitted that the AO show caused the assessee in clear why an order imposing a penalty on you should not be made u/s 271AAB in the second para of notice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... prima facie satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings. The AO discussed the facts and circumstances of the case leading to initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271AAB in his order i.e cash other valuables, jewellery, silver utensils and articles, bank accounts and seized documents. The AO clearly stated that the assessee admitted ₹ 5 crore as undisclosed income derived from the activity under commodity profit which was disclosed under section 132(4) of the Act and prayed to confirm the order of CIT (A). 9. Regarding the contention of failure of the AO to point out specifically a particular limb of section 271AAB of the Act, the Ld. DR submitted that section 271AAB has no such limbs and what are given therein are the different situations involving different rates of penalty. He contended that since the case of the assessee was covered by one situation attracting penalty under section 271AAB @ 10% of the undisclosed income, penalty @ 10% was rightly imposed under section 271AAB. He contended that the commodity profit was not reflected in the books of accounts of the assessee and since it was reflected in the documents seized during the co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eturn u/s 139 including disclosed income paying entire tax liability on 26.09.2013. The above proves that it is a fit case for levying penalty u/s 271 AAB of the IT. Act, 1961 for undisclosed income of the assessee. As a result, therefore, a penalty of ₹ 50,00,000/- (being 10% of the disclosed income of ₹ 5,00,00,000/-) is being levied upon the assessee. 13. It is noted from the above that the AO held the assessee to liable to pay penalty under section 271AAB of the Act by holding that a search was conducted on 06.09.2012 and a disclosure of ₹ 5 crores was made and paid tax liability including on the undisclosed income as admitted by the assessee during search proceedings. It is pertinent to note that a total assessed income of the assessee as determined by the AO in the assessment proceedings is consists of the undisclosed income as mentioned above. 14. Aggrieved by the order of AO in imposing penalty, the assessee challenged the same before the CIT(A). The specific contention was made before the CIT(A) that penalty under section 271AAB is not mandatory for the reasons as there was no concealment of income, retu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... abad was pleased to observe that though notice was issued u/s 274 r.w.s 271 of the Act, the AO clearly indicated that the proceedings u/s 271AAB of the Act initiated and show caused the assessee to reply in writing on or before specified date and is sufficient to initiate and complete the penalty proceedings. 17. Further in respect of the arguments as advanced by the Ld.AR that no penalty should be levied when the assessee duly disclosed the manner of earning the said undisclosed income under the head commodity profit in the return of income. It is to be noted on perusal of the provision u/s 271AAB of the Act the predominant condition to attract penalty provisions u/s 271AAB of the Act, admission of undisclosed income, specifying and substantiating the manner in which such income has been derived, paid the tax together with interest and furnishes return of income declaring such undisclosed income. Therefore, it is clear when the assessee admits the undisclosed income, specifies and substantiate the same, pays the tax together with interest and furnishes return of income, the penalty provisions u/s 271AAB of the Act would attract. Therefore, the contentions raised b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (1). (3) The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. 19. On reading of the above provision u/s 271AAB, explains that in a search case the AO may direct the assessee to pay penalty as computed at the rates specified in the clauses (a), (b) (c) of sub section (1) of 271AAB of the Act and the assessee shall pay penalty in addition to the tax on undisclosed income disclosed by the assessee made at the stage of making statement u/s 132(4) of the Act or during the assessment proceedings. In the present case as discussed above that the assessee accepted disclosure of ₹ 5,00,00,000/- as its undisclosed income from undisclosed source. It is also noted that the same has been computed as disclosure u/s 134(2) in the computation of total income in the assessment order. There is no dispute regarding the payment of tax together with interest in respect of such undisclosed income and the specified date of filing return of income. So, therefore, it is clear from the record that the assessee admitted undisclosed income and the statement was recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act to t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... me and specified manner in which such income has been derived, than the provisions of Section 271AAB automatically attracts and the proceedings are to be carried out/completed. We have noticed that the penalty notice has been issued under Section 274 read with section 271. Section 274 provides that no order imposing a penalty shall be made unless the assessee has been heard or has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. In the instant case the penalty notice issued clearly indicates that the opportunity of being heard is provided to the assessee and therefore, the penalty notices has been issued under Section 274 read with section 271 calling upon the assessee to show cause in writing or in person which fulfill the requirement of Section 274 of the Act. In the present case, the provisions of Section 271AAB are fully applicable as of the conditions so stipulated or attracts as a search has been initiated under Section 132 and during the course of search the statement of the assessee has been recorded under sub section (4) of Section 132, in which the assessees admit undisclosed income and specifies the manner in which such income has bee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f notice has been produced by the Ld. A.R. before me. It is seen that the Ld. A.R. is correct in observing that the section of penalty has not been correctly mentioned by the AO in the caption. However, the AO will get the benefit of section 292BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 because firstly, the assessee has raised no objection before the AO in this regard. Secondly, last line of the notice clearly mentions section 271AAB. Thirdly, the assessee has given reply to said notice which shows that the assessee fully comprehended the implication of the notice that it is for section 271AAB. The assessee has also challenged that the principles of natural justice has not followed by the AO. The detailed submissions of A.R. in this regard has already been reproduced above. The A.R. did not produce any evidence to show that he was not given proper opportunity of hearing. It is clear from the penalty order that the AO has given penalty notice and which was also replied by the assessee. Therefore, in my opinion, principle of natural justice has not been violated. Thus in view of above discussion penalty imposed by AO u/s 271AAB of the Act is confirmed. Since ad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates