TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 157X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... who is present. The Court directs that ITA be listed before the ITAT on 3rd June, 2019 at 10.30 am. The ITAT will endeavour, with the co-operation of counsel for the parties, to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible. - W.P.(C) 4094/2019 - - - Dated:- 30-5-2019 - S. MURALIDHAR AND ASHA MENON JJ. Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Rastogi, Mr. K.N. Ahuja, Mr. Rohit Jain, Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocates. O R D E R 1. The Revenue has filed this petition challenging an interim order dated 2 nd January 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Stay Application No. 984/Del/2018 arising out of ITA 8058 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he notice accompanied by a copy of this order shall be separately issued without process fee and transmitted to the Registrar of the ITAT to ensure compliance. 4. The Court has perused the original record sent to this Court by the Registry of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). There are two folders. In one of them, there is a noting to the effect that there is dictation of an order on 2nd January, 2019 itself. The pages of the stenographer s note book containing the said dictation with the date of 2nd January, 2019 is available in the file. 5. There is another folder (orange cover) in which there is an endorsement of that the main appeal and ( stay ad ) is listed on 14th January, 2019. While Mr. Zoheb Hossain, l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ITAT are stated to be pending in this Court. 8. In the circumstances, the Court does not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned order of the ITAT except to observe that the main appeal pending before it i.e. ITA No. 8058/Del/2018 for AY 2015-16 should now be heard on merits by the ITAT and disposed of at an early date. 9. In this regard, it is noticed that in the impugned order dated 2nd January 2019 itself, the ITAT had stated that no unnecessary adjournment would be sought by the Assessee. The Court finds from the order sheets that adjournments have been sought on several dates thereafter by the Revenue. It appears that a special counsel has appointed for the Revenue in the said appeal. Although the appeal w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|