9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 176X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... preciating the submissions made by the Government Pleader. The merit in these submissions is dependent on the objections raised by a party and how they are dealt with by the authority. The order of the authority ought to reflect how it is considered the errors pointed out - It is sufficient to hold that the orders now impugned in these two writ petitions suffer from too much of brevity and the ord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ;the Act'). The petitioner through Exts.P4 and P5 applied for rectification of errors under Section 66 of the Act. The request for rectification refers to a few legal objections and the consequential effect on a few additions made by the first respondent. The first respondent rejected the request for rectification of order and the order reads thus: The request made ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etion and jurisdiction commensurate to the errors pointed out by the petitioner. The legality or otherwise of the order is not dependent on the length of the order. In other words, the first respondent, according to the Government Pleader, did not find an error and therefore did not correct the error. For not correcting the error and refusing the request first respondent need not give reasons. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... first respondent for fresh consideration in accordance with law. 6. The petitioner is directed to appear before the first respondent on 22nd April 2019 with additional reply or documents on which the petitioner intends to support its case and when the petitioner appears, the first respondent gives an opportunity of hearing as well and the first respondent passes an order on or befo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
