9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (4) TMI 1267X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e by the Government on the basis of the information given by the petitioner - HELD THAT:- If the citizens who acting on the representation made by the Government, give some valuable information and upon receipt of such information the tax recoveries are made and subsequently, the citizens are made to run from pillar to post for getting such reward, citizens would lose faith in the system and would ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... :- 28-4-2015 - B.R.Gavai And A.S.Gadkari, JJ. Mr.Suresh Patil,Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Vinay Sonpal And Mrs. neeta Masurkar for Respondent. P.C. The petitioner has approached this Court praying for a Writ directing the Respondent to pay the reward money to the petitioner in accordance with the Circular, which is annexed to the petition. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... #8377; 75,000/- to the petitioner as an interim measure. 4. A Division Bench of this Court at Nagpur Bench (to which one of us i.e. B.R.Gavai, J. is a party) recently had an occasion to consider similar issue in Public Interest Litigation No. 99 of 2014 (Lalan Kishor Singh vs. State of Maharashtra Anr) decided on 9.3.2015. We have categorically observed that if the Department initiall ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a loss to the Public Exchequer. 6. Though in the present case, Mr. Sonpal submits that entire recovery is not on account of the information given by the petitioner, but has fairly admitted that part of the recovery is on the basis of the information given by the petitioner. 7. If that be so, the Respondent-Authorities can very well determine as to what percentage o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
