Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (6) TMI 1300

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent year 2011-12. 2.The above Tax Case Appeal has been filed raising the following substantial questions of law:- "(i) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in setting aside the order of the Dispute Resolution Panel on the misconstruction of the provisions of sub-sections (5), (7) and (8) of Section 144C of the Act even though the issues before the DRP were decided by them based on the materials furnished for reaching their conclusions in para 3.2.1 and para 3.3.4 of the order dated 24.11.2015? (ii) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in exceeding the grounds canvassed by the Revenue at the time of filing the appeal, at the time of the hearing as well as based on the report furnished by the TPO in the hearing co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... de the matter and at best can call for remand report from any Income Tax Authority and decide the issue itself by adjudicating the matter. To resolve the controversy raised, it may be necessary for us to take note of Section 144C of the Act and the relevant sub sections which are quoted herein below: "144C(1) The Assessing Officer shall, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act, in the first instance, forward a draft of the proposed order of assessment (hereafter in this section referred to as the draft order) to the eligible assessee if he proposes to make, on or after the 1st day of October, 2009, any variation in the income or loss returned which is prejudicial to the interest of such assessee. (2)...... (3).. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r objections in terms of sub section 2 of Section 144(C), in terms of sub section 5 of Section 144C. The DRP shall, in a case where any objection is received under sub section 2, issue such directions, as it thinks fit, for the guidance of the Assessing Officer to enable them to complete the assessment. 7. In terms of sub section 7, the DRP may, before issuing any directions referred to in sub-section 5 make such further enquiry, as it thinks fit; or cause any further enquiry to be made by any income tax authority and report the result of the same to it. 8. Sub Section 8 of Section 144C empowers the DRP to confirm, reduce or enhance the variations proposed in the draft assessment order, however, it shall not set aside any proposed variati .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as for comparables and directing that appropriate adjustment should be allowed to the assessee. 4. The Hon'ble DRP failed to note that the assessee while calculating the PLI of M/s.Ashnoor Textiles Mills Ltd., has not included other operational expenditure of the industry amounting to Rs. 4.17 crores thereby ending with a positive operating profit, whereas the TPO has included this operational expenditure and arrived at a negative OP/OC at (-) 5.13%" 13. On a perusal of the above grounds, it is seen that the Revenue was aggrieved by the assessment order dated 28.12.2015. On merits we find that the Revenue has not questioned the jurisdiction of the DRP which order had worked itself out and culminated in an assessment order dated 28.1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dated 25.02.2015. Thus, in our considered view, the Tribunal was not right in holding that the DRP exceeded its jurisdiction in passing the order. In any event, the order passed by the DRP was not impugned before the Tribunal rather what was impugned was the assessment order dated 28.12.2015 passed under Section 144C(13) r/w Section 143(3) of the Act. Therefore, the Tribunal was required to consider on merits whether the said assessment order was justified or not. 16. The learned counsel for the Revenue as well as the other senior standing counsel for the Revenue namely Mr.Swaminathan and Mr.Karthick Ranganathan submitted that the above judgement rendered by us is likely to be misinterpreted with regard to the powers of the DRP as circumsc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates